A back-to-back letter of credit (LC) is a financial instrument in international trade where two separate LCs are used to facilitate a transaction between a buyer and a seller.
The first LC is issued by the buyer’s bank (also known as the “importer bank”), and is addressed to the seller’s bank (also known as the “exporter bank”). This LC serves as collateral for the seller, ensuring that they will be paid for the goods or services they provide.
The second LC is issued by the seller’s bank, and is addressed to the actual supplier’s bank. This LC is used to purchase the goods or services required to fulfil the original contract, and serves as collateral for the supplier.
Table of Contents
How does a back to back letter of credit work?
A back-to-back letter of credit (LC) is a financial arrangement that involves two separate LCs to facilitate a transaction between a buyer and a seller. Here’s how it works:
The buyer (importer) and the seller (exporter) agree on a contract that outlines the terms of the transaction.
The buyer applies for an LC from their bank (importer’s bank) in favor of the seller (beneficiary), which serves as collateral for the transaction. This is the first LC.
The seller uses the first LC as collateral to apply for a second LC from their bank (exporter’s bank) in favor of their supplier (second beneficiary). This is the back-to-back LC.
The second LC provides payment assurance for the supplier, who can then provide the goods or services required to fulfill the original contract.
Once the goods or services are delivered, the seller receives payment from the buyer’s bank under the first LC. The seller then uses that payment to repay the second LC issued by their bank to the supplier.
In essence, a back-to-back LC involves two separate transactions, each of which is secured by an LC. The first LC is used to secure the transaction between the buyer and the seller, while the second LC is used to secure the transaction between the seller and the supplier.
Back-to-back LCs are commonly used in situations where the supplier is unable to fulfill the original contract directly, and needs to purchase goods or services from a third party in order to do so. They can be a useful tool for facilitating complex international trade transactions, providing additional security and reducing risk for all parties involved.
Back to back vs Transferable letter of credit
Both back-to-back and transferable letters of credit (LC) are financial instruments used in international trade to facilitate transactions between buyers and sellers. However, there are some key differences between the two.
Back-to-back LCs involve two separate LCs being issued to facilitate a transaction between a buyer and a seller. The first LC is issued by the buyer’s bank in favor of the seller, while the second LC is issued by the seller’s bank in favor of the supplier. In essence, the second LC is backed by the first LC, and is used to purchase goods or services required to fulfill the original contract. Back-to-back LCs are commonly used when the seller needs to purchase goods or services from a third party in order to fulfill the original contract.
Transferable LCs, on the other hand, allow the seller to transfer some or all of the credit available under the LC to a third party. In other words, the seller can use the LC as collateral to obtain financing from a third party, and transfer some or all of the credit available to that party. Transferable LCs are commonly used when the seller is acting as a middleman, purchasing goods from one party and selling them to another.
Overall, the main difference between back-to-back and transferable LCs is that back-to-back LCs involve two separate LCs, while transferable LCs involve a single LC that can be transferred to a third party. Both instruments can be useful in facilitating international trade transactions, but the choice between the two will depend on the specific needs and circumstances of the parties involved.
Advantages of Back to back letter of credit
Back-to-back letters of credit (LC) have several advantages for buyers, sellers, and suppliers involved in international trade transactions, including:
Increased security: A back-to-back LC provides additional security for all parties involved in the transaction. The buyer has the assurance that the seller will provide the required goods or services, while the seller and supplier have the assurance that they will be paid for their work.
Flexibility: Back-to-back LCs are highly flexible and can be tailored to meet the specific needs of the parties involved in the transaction. For example, the parties can negotiate the terms and conditions of the LC to ensure that it meets their requirements.
Reduced risk: Back-to-back LCs can help to reduce the risk of non-payment or other problems that can arise in international trade transactions. By providing additional security and reducing uncertainty, they can help to make the transaction smoother and more predictable.
Simplified process: Back-to-back LCs simplify the transaction process by reducing the need for direct contact between the buyer, seller, and supplier. This can help to streamline the process and make it more efficient.
Improved cash flow: Back-to-back LCs can help to improve cash flow for all parties involved in the transaction. For example, the seller can use the LC as collateral to obtain financing from their bank, which can help them to pay their suppliers more quickly.
Overall, back-to-back LCs are a useful tool for facilitating international trade transactions, providing additional security and reducing risk for all parties involved.
Disadvantages of Back to back letter of credit
While back-to-back letters of credit (LC) offer several advantages, they also have some potential disadvantages that should be considered by buyers, sellers, and suppliers involved in international trade transactions, including:
Increased costs: Back-to-back LCs can be more expensive than other forms of payment, such as open account transactions or cash-in-advance. The parties involved may have to pay fees to their banks for issuing and managing the LCs, which can increase the overall cost of the transaction.
Complexity: Back-to-back LCs can be complex and may require more documentation than other forms of payment. This can make the process more time-consuming and potentially more error-prone.
Limited access to credit: Back-to-back LCs may not be available to all buyers or sellers, as they require the involvement of two banks. Some banks may be reluctant to issue back-to-back LCs, particularly for small transactions or when dealing with unknown parties.
Limited flexibility: Back-to-back LCs may be less flexible than other forms of payment, as they are tied to a specific transaction and cannot be easily modified or cancelled.
Increased risk of fraud: Back-to-back LCs are more complex than other forms of payment, which can increase the risk of fraud. Parties involved in the transaction should be careful to verify the authenticity of the LC and all related documentation to ensure that they are not subject to fraudulent activity.
Overall, while back-to-back LCs can provide additional security and reduce risk in international trade transactions, the parties involved should carefully consider the potential disadvantages and assess whether a back-to-back LC is the best option for their specific needs and circumstances.
Back to back letter of credit FAQs
What are the benefits of using a back-to-back LC?
The benefits of using a back-to-back LC include increased security, flexibility, reduced risk, simplified process, and improved cash flow. For example, a back-to-back LC provides additional security for all parties involved in the transaction and can help to reduce the risk of non-payment or other problems that can arise in international trade transactions.
Suggested Readings
- How to clear CDCS Exam
- Back to Back Letter of Credit
- Transferable letter of credit
- What is a Letter of Credit?
- 30 CDCS sample questions with answers
- Disregard, Obligation and Without Delay in UCP 600
- Incoterms 2020 for CDCS exam
- The words Must, May and Should in UCP 600
- What is a Bill of Lading?
- eUCP 2.0 – Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits for Electronic Presentation Version 2.0
- URR 725 – Uniform Rules for Bank-to-Bank Reimbursements under Documentary Credits
- UCP 600 – Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits
- SWIFT message types relevant for CDCS Exam